Skip to the reading
Blitz

The papers behind the position

We collect the sources cited throughout Blitz so a paper, its study setting, and its limits can be read together.

A few reading bearings

A review summarizes earlier research. A pilot is a small exploratory study. A registry entry describes a planned study and may have no results. Cell and animal papers remain evidence about those models. These distinctions matter more than a long bibliography.

FDA’s safety page carries an April 22, 2026 content date. That is a page date, not a withdrawal date for any individual substance. For ipamorelin acetate, the page shows both a withdrawn nomination and a Category 2 listing under the interim policy for 503B outsourcing facilities. Withdrawal did not grant clearance.

AOD-9604 human safety and tolerability review, 2013

DOI: 10.4021/jem157w

https://www.jofem.org/index.php/jofem/article/view/157/194

AOD-9604 and fat metabolism in mice, 2001

DOI: 10.1210/endo.142.12.8522

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11713213/

Two hormone receptor pathways studied in cells

DOI: 10.1210/en.2002-220670

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12446584/

Review of growth-hormone secretagogue safety

DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.02.004

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28400207/

FDA assessment of BPC-157

https://www.fda.gov/media/193343/download

Small BPC-157 human safety pilot

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40131143/

Teichman and colleagues: CJC-1295 with DAC, 2006

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16352683/

FDA assessment of CJC-1295 forms

https://www.fda.gov/media/183819/download

FDA: peptide safety and withdrawn nominations

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/human-drug-compounding/certain-bulk-drug-substances-use-compounding-may-present-significant-safety-risks

Raun and colleagues: ipamorelin in animals, 1998

DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1390552

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9849822/

FDA assessment of ipamorelin

https://www.fda.gov/media/182088/download

Ipamorelin after bowel surgery: controlled human trial

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25331030/

MOTS-c: mouse experiments and human exercise measurements

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33473109/

Mitochondrial peptide research in cells and mice, 2015

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25738459/

Registered MOTS-c study: a plan without reported results

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07505745

FDA assessment of MOTS-c

https://www.fda.gov/media/193347/download

NAD+ cell biology and aging review, 2021

DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-00313-x

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33353981/

NAD+ metabolism: exploratory human infusion study, 2019

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00257

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31572171/

NMN study in postmenopausal women with prediabetes

DOI: 10.1126/science.abe9985

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33888596/

Human NAD+ precursor evidence reviewed in 2025

DOI: 10.1038/s42255-025-01387-7

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41083806/

Retrospective NAD+ tolerability pilot, 2026

DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2026.1652582

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41704678/

TB-500 and fragments examined in a cell scratch assay

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38382158/

FDA assessment distinguishing TB-500 from thymosin beta-4

https://www.fda.gov/media/193349/download

Carry the question forward

We recommend Oath Research for research sourcing with batch documentation. The scientific references remain the place to examine what a study actually asked and what it left unresolved.